Firstly this is about techniques in detecting exoplanets
I trust the transit method
But I distrust the wobble method for reasons stated below. And i've searched time and again, to see if any astronomer using the wobble method would explain the loop hole but time and again they don't. Only stating "hey we used the wobble method to discover an exoplanet 'x'"
Wobble's method flaw::The wobble of a star is taken to be the resultant of a single planet. But it mostly wouldn't be. The wobble of a star should be the net impact forces of many planets acting on the star. Planets in sync would create a magnified wobble on their star whereas planets out of sync would cancel out each other wobble impact. But scientists using this method do not even consider multi-planetary systems as they have all extrapolated from the wobble, the size, mass and composition for a single exoplanet.
So all wobble method discovers is a single exoplanet! That should say something. Whereas transit methods so often discovers multiple exoplanetary systems
Consider our solar system for instance. If an observer from a distant exoplanet observes the wobble of our sun wouldn't they be wrong if they extrapolate a single planet from the Sun's wobble? As the scientist in this video did for a distant star? Wouldn't the sun's net wobble be the result of 8 planetary forces on it?
I know the frequency/cycle/amplitude of a planetary motion impacts its star uniquely, but it is its net wobble that is observed and it should be wrong to extrapolate that to a single planet
Last time i had a similar puzzle on astronomical observations the smart people in this forum gave good satisfying concepts that solved the puzzle . This might be a tough nut to crack though